ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT · SOURCE-REVIEWED INTERIM ORDER

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1 v. Rupali Mittal

INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 16 of 2025 ·
Supplied court order; reported citation not indexed

Notice was issued; steps were due within a week and the office was to provide dasti. Listing with Income Tax Appeal 8/2025 was fixed for 27 November 2025.

Division Bench · Sangeeta Chandra · Amitabh Kumar Rai

1. Facts of the case

A separate Revenue appeal against Rupali Mittal came up for service directions.

Source: PDF p.1, complete supplied order

2. Discussion by the Hon’ble Court

The Court required ordinary and personal dasti service and connected listing with Appeal 8/2025.

Source: PDF p.1, complete supplied order

3. Judicial decision

Notice was issued; steps were due within a week and the office was to provide dasti. Listing with Income Tax Appeal 8/2025 was fixed for 27 November 2025.

Source: PDF p.1, complete supplied order

4. Outcome / in whose favour

Appeal 16/2025 remained pending, linked for listing with Appeal 8/2025.

Source: PDF p.1, complete supplied order

5. Expert Comments

AKHB editorial analysis, distinct from the Court’s findings. Subsequent treatment and current-law applicability have not been verified.

Joint listing preserves two distinct appeals

Appeal 16/2025 was to be listed with Appeal 8/2025 on 27 November 2025. The shared respondent and linked hearing do not merge their dockets, establish identical assessment years or make one order a duplicate of the other.

Source: PDF p.1 · PDF 1

The order imposed service obligations, not merits findings

One-week steps and personal dasti service additional to normal service remain the concrete directions in this appeal. The short interval to the listed date should not be rewritten as a different service deadline. No admitted question, stay or substantive tax ruling appears.

Source: PDF p.1 · PDF 1

Source and verification

Complete supplied 1-page original read and every page visually inspected; original PDF bytes verified by SHA-256 against the review ledger. Only source-identified provisions and assessment years are indexed. No PAN is stated. No current-law clearance is claimed.

Source SHA-256: d386d1512f542259b49a185ce7b9e5a540c9a69bf5b219f85c121de7a8e4c6b9

Only source-identified provisions are recorded. No current monetary threshold, current statutory equivalence or 2025 Act applicability is inferred.

Source checked 2026-10-21. Subsequent proceedings and current precedential treatment have not been comprehensively verified.

AI disclosure and professional disclaimer

This AKHB research note was prepared with AI assistance from an identified primary report. Independent human review is not represented.

General legal and tax research only; not legal or tax advice. Verify the complete judgment, applicable statutory version and subsequent treatment before reliance. The AKHB Expert Comments is editorial analysis, not the Court’s holding. No current-law clearance is claimed.