ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT · SOURCE-REVIEWED PROCEDURAL ORDER
Manjari Agrawal v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another
Writ Tax No. 2750 Of 2025 ·
2025:AHC:108667-DB
the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Division Bench · Shekhar B. Saraf · Praveen Kumar Giri
1. Facts of the case
Manjari Agrawal requested withdrawal through counsel.
2. Discussion by the Hon’ble Court
The Bench accepted the withdrawal request without examining the underlying tax merits.
3. Judicial decision
the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Outcome / in whose favour
The proceeding ended at the requesting party’s instance.
5. Expert Comments
AKHB editorial analysis, distinct from the Court’s findings. Subsequent treatment and current-law applicability have not been verified.
Instructions to withdraw explain the disposal
Manjari Agrawal’s counsel stated that he had instructions to withdraw; departmental counsel was present. The Court dismissed Writ Tax 2750/2025 on that submission. It did not determine the tax action challenged or disclose the reason for withdrawal.
Source: PDF p.1 · PDF p.1, complete supplied order
Use as a closure record
No express fresh-petition liberty, settlement or stay is recorded. The presence of departmental counsel is not a concession on the merits. Any claim about extinguished liability or a later remedy requires the underlying or subsequent order rather than an inference from withdrawal.
Source: PDF p.1 · PDF p.1, complete supplied order
Source and verification
Complete supplied 1-page original read and all source page images visually inspected; original bytes verified by SHA-256 against the ledger. No PAN is stated. Subsequent treatment and current law have not been cleared.
Source SHA-256: 3f40cf15e6c13bd688f8a78f34958e2693a60352b3a0a31244fa4604b8b2c84b
Only source-identified provisions are recorded. No current monetary threshold, current statutory equivalence or 2025 Act applicability is inferred.
Source checked 2026-10-21. Subsequent proceedings and current precedential treatment have not been comprehensively verified.
AI disclosure and professional disclaimer
This AKHB research note was prepared with AI assistance from an identified primary report. Independent human review is not represented.
General legal and tax research only; not legal or tax advice. Verify the complete judgment, applicable statutory version and subsequent treatment before reliance. The Expert Comments section is editorial analysis, not the Court’s holding. No current-law clearance is claimed.