ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT · SOURCE-REVIEWED PROCEDURAL ORDER
Abdullah Khan v. Income Tax Officer And Another
WRIT - C No. 38583 of 2023 ·
2023:AHC:236078-DB
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
Division Bench · Mahesh Chandra Tripathi · Prashant Kumar
1. Facts of the case
Counsel reported that the petitioner’s grievance had already been redressed and the cause for the writ no longer survived.
2. Discussion by the Hon’ble Court
On that recorded basis the Court treated the petition as infructuous.
3. Judicial decision
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
4. Outcome / in whose favour
No remaining controversy was decided on merits.
5. Expert Comments
AKHB editorial analysis, distinct from the Court’s findings. Subsequent treatment and current-law applicability have not been verified.
Reported redress removed the live grievance
Abdullah Khan’s counsel stated that the grievance had already been redressed. The Court reasoned that no cause for the writ then survived and dismissed it as infructuous. This is more specific than a bare passage-of-time disposal, but does not identify the administrative relief granted.
Source: PDF p.1 · PDF p.1, complete supplied order
Separate closure from the content of relief
Use this order to establish the writ’s closure on the basis of reported redress. The relevant departmental communication is still needed to show what was corrected, for which period and amount. The High Court did not adjudicate a residual tax issue or order a particular refund or cancellation here.
Source: PDF p.1 · PDF p.1, complete supplied order
Source and verification
Complete supplied 1-page original read and visually inspected; original bytes independently SHA-256 verified against source map and ledger. No present-law or subsequent-treatment clearance is claimed.
Source SHA-256: f1b4d92981040388975913f7481b70a7882715cc485248cb9f38b4778233a859
Only source-identified provisions are recorded. No current monetary threshold, current statutory equivalence or 2025 Act applicability is inferred.
Source checked 2026-10-21. Subsequent proceedings and current precedential treatment have not been comprehensively verified.
AI disclosure and professional disclaimer
This AKHB research note was prepared with AI assistance from an identified primary report. Independent human review is not represented.
General legal and tax research only; not legal or tax advice. Verify the complete judgment, applicable statutory version and subsequent treatment before reliance. The Expert Comments section is editorial analysis, not the Court’s holding. No current-law clearance is claimed.