ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT · SOURCE-REVIEWED PROCEDURAL ORDER
M/s Nimbus Motors Pvt. Ltd., Noida v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, G.B. Nagar and Another
Writ Tax No.583 of 2016 ·
Supplied court order; no reported citation stated
The writ was dismissed as withdrawn.
Division Bench · Surya Prakash Kesarwani · Jayant Banerji
1. Facts of the case
M/s Nimbus Motors Pvt. Ltd., Noida v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, G.B. Nagar and Another, Writ Tax No.583 of 2016. Counsel for Nimbus Motors said the petitioner intended to pursue its remedy before the Assessing Authority and requested withdrawal. Revenue counsel was present. The supplied one-page order does not identify AY, PAN or the underlying tax amount.
2. Discussion by the Hon’ble Court
The Court disposed of the request recorded in the supplied order. No substantive tax issue or underlying assessment was adjudicated.
3. Judicial decision
The writ was dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Outcome / in whose favour
The proceeding ended on the stated procedural basis. No tax claim was allowed or disallowed on merits by this short order.
5. AKHB REVIEW POINT
The intention to pursue an authority remedy is counsel's stated reason. No express limitation extension, admission of a later application, condonation or substantive tax relief is granted. Use the printed order date rather than a later digital-signature timestamp.
Source and verification
Complete supplied one-page original read and visually inspected; original PDF bytes verified by SHA-256. Only source-identified provisions and assessment years are recorded. No PAN is stated. Subsequent treatment and current law have not been cleared.
Source SHA-256: 80e880e6da416d2387fce246b518caaf9f70de722385b554fc93b59708cc0c24
Only source-identified provisions are recorded. No current monetary threshold, current statutory equivalence or 2025 Act applicability is inferred.
Source checked 2026-10-19. Subsequent proceedings and current precedential treatment have not been comprehensively verified.
AI disclosure and professional disclaimer
This AKHB research note was prepared with AI assistance from an identified primary report. Independent human review is not represented.
General legal and tax research only; not legal or tax advice. Verify the complete judgment, applicable statutory version and subsequent treatment before reliance. The AKHB REVIEW POINT is editorial analysis, not the Court’s holding. No current-law clearance is claimed.