HON’BLE SUPREME COURT · SOURCE-REVIEWED NOTE
Management of Central Coal Washery v. Workmen and Another
Civil Appeal No. 1848 of 1970
[1978] 3 SCR 1023 ·
Income-tax Act, 1961: section 32(1) · Payment of Bonus Act, 1965: section 16(1)(a) and Explanation II
Sources & disclosures includedDownload original judgment / order
Two-judge bench; judgment delivered by P. N. Bhagwati, J. · P. N. Bhagwati, J. · V. D. Tulzapurkar, J.
Assessment years: 1964-65, 1965-66, 1966-67, 1967-68, 1968-69
01 · Facts of the case
A newly established organisation operated three coal washeries and used straight-line depreciation in its accounts, producing apparent profits for 1964-65 through 1968-69. Workmen claimed statutory bonus, while the employer said section 16 postponed liability because no profit remained after the depreciation allowed under the Income-tax Act (SCR pp.1023-1026; PDF pp.1-4).
02 · Discussion by the Hon’ble Court
The Court read “profit” in its commercial sense, but held that Explanation II supplied a controlling legislative direction: whatever accounting method the employer used, depreciation had to be deducted according to the Income-tax Act, including section 32(1), before asking whether profit existed for section 16(1)(a) (SCR pp.1027-1029; PDF pp.5-7).
03 · Judicial decision
After applying Income-tax Act depreciation, the Court held that the employer had not derived profit from the washeries in any of the five years. It allowed the appeal and set aside the bonus award, with no order as to costs.
04 · Outcome / in whose favour
In favour of the employer; the workmen were not entitled to statutory bonus for 1964-65 through 1968-69.
Source: Primary judgment: outcome
05 · AKHB REVIEW POINT
AKHB analysis: when another enactment incorporates an Income-tax Act measure, compute the incorporated item under the tax statute before applying the host statute. Do not generalise this bonus-law holding beyond the incorporation text.
Source & verification
Download original judgment / order · Open cited source rendition
Complete seven-page SCR report read in page-preserving text and every page image inspected.
- Exact catalogue SHA-256 and seven-page count verified; all pages were read and visually inspected.
- Identity, bench, statutory issue, reasoning and operative result were checked against the complete report.
Statutory scope
A Payment of Bonus Act case in which the Income-tax Act depreciation rule was an express statutory input. Both enactments and later treatment require present verification.
Later treatment
Source checked 2026-10-12. No comprehensive current-law or later-treatment clearance is represented.
Page references identify the supplied PDF; paragraph references identify the judgment unless stated otherwise.
Coverage, AI disclosure & professional disclaimer
Selected Supreme Court income-tax decisions and procedural orders checked against their identified sources. This collection is not exhaustive. The research catalogue has 2,569 indexed PDF assets, including alternate copies and incidental matches; that is not a count of unique or reviewed judgments. Historical and unreported coverage remains open.
AI-assisted research checked against the identified source. Extraction, interpretation or omission errors remain possible. Source review does not mean independent approval by a practising professional. Verify every material statement against the complete original judgment.
General research information only; not legal or tax advice, a certified judgment or a substitute for the full order. Applicability depends on facts, assessment year, statutory version and jurisdiction. Subsequent treatment is unverified unless a note expressly identifies the sources checked. Downloading does not create a professional engagement. Obtain case-specific advice before reliance.
The official 1961–2025 structural correspondence does not establish that a precedent applies under the new Act. Verify the enacted wording, commencement and transitional provisions separately.