HON’BLE SUPREME COURT · SOURCE-REVIEWED NOTE
Commissioner of Income Tax, Mysore, Bangalore v. Mysore Electrical Industries Ltd.
Civil Appeal No. 1794 of 1970
[1971] Supp SCR 521 ·
Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964: sections 2 and 4; Second Schedule rule 1
Sources & disclosures includedDownload original judgment / order
5-judge bench · S. M. Sikri, C.J. · G. K. Mitter, J. · C. A. Vaidialingam, J. · P. Jaganmohan Reddy, J. · I. D. Dua, J.
Assessment years: 1964-65
01 · Facts of the case
For the year ended 31 March 1963, the directors on 8 August 1963 proposed Rs.2,56,000 as plant modernisation and rehabilitation reserve, Rs.1,00,000 as loan redemption reserve and Rs.89,557 as development rebate reserve. The issue was whether these amounts entered the company’s capital as at 1 April 1963 for the first surtax assessment year.
Source: SCR pp. 521-523 / PDF pp. 1-3
02 · Discussion by the Hon’ble Court
Accounts for the year ending 31 March could not practically be finalised and presented on 1 April. The later determination to divide the prior year’s undistributed profits into the specified reserves related to the opening of the new accounting year. The Court preferred the Bombay approach recognising this effect over the contrary Madras view that no reserve existed until formal allocation.
Source: SCR pp. 523-525 / PDF pp. 3-5
03 · Judicial decision
The High Court’s conclusion was upheld. Revenue’s appeal was dismissed with costs, and the identified appropriations were treated as effective from 1 April 1963 for the rule 1 capital computation.
Source: SCR p. 525 / PDF p. 5
04 · Outcome / in whose favour
In favour of the assessee company on including the three reserves in historical surtax capital.
Source: SCR pp. 524-525 / PDF pp. 4-5
05 · AKHB REVIEW POINT
AKHB analysis: preserve the year-end accounts, directors’ recommendation, shareholder action and the exact statutory definition of reserve. Relation back here followed the annual accounts and the then surtax schedule; it is not a substitute for examining current recognition and tax rules.
Source: AKHB analysis based on SCR pp. 523-525 / PDF pp. 3-5
Source & verification
Download original judgment / order · Open cited source rendition
Full 5-page SCR report read, separating the editorial headnote from the judicial text.
- Full source read; exact original bytes match the catalogue SHA-256. Judicial text is unnumbered, so SCR and PDF page pinpoints are used.
Statutory scope
The judgment concerns the first assessment year under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 and the then Second Schedule. It does not certify treatment under later reserve, dividend or minimum-tax provisions.
Later treatment
Source checked 2026-10-10. Comprehensive subsequent treatment has not been verified; no current citator clearance is represented.
Page references identify the supplied PDF; paragraph references identify the judgment unless stated otherwise.
Coverage, AI disclosure & professional disclaimer
Selected Supreme Court income-tax decisions and procedural orders checked against their identified sources. This collection is not exhaustive. The research catalogue has 2,569 indexed PDF assets, including alternate copies and incidental matches; that is not a count of unique or reviewed judgments. Historical and unreported coverage remains open.
AI-assisted research checked against the identified source. Extraction, interpretation or omission errors remain possible. Source review does not mean independent approval by a practising professional. Verify every material statement against the complete original judgment.
General research information only; not legal or tax advice, a certified judgment or a substitute for the full order. Applicability depends on facts, assessment year, statutory version and jurisdiction. Subsequent treatment is unverified unless a note expressly identifies the sources checked. Downloading does not create a professional engagement. Obtain case-specific advice before reliance.
The official 1961–2025 structural correspondence does not establish that a precedent applies under the new Act. Verify the enacted wording, commencement and transitional provisions separately.