HON’BLE SUPREME COURT · SOURCE-REVIEWED NOTE
Sri Sudhansu Shekhar Singh Deo v. The State of Orissa and Another
Civil Appeals Nos. 307 to 309 of 1958
[1961] 1 SCR 779 ·
Orissa Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1947: sections 2(i), 3 and 14(1) · Constitution of India: Articles 132, 226, 291, 362 and 363 · Government of India Act, 1935: sections 290A and 290B · Extra-Provincial Jurisdiction Act, 1947
Sources & disclosures includedDownload original judgment / order
5-judge bench; unanimous judgment delivered by J. C. Shah, J. · S. K. Das, J. · M. Hidayatullah, J. · K. C. Das Gupta, J. · J. C. Shah, J. · N. Rajagopala Ayyangar, J.
Assessment years: 1950-51, 1951-52, 1952-53
01 · Facts of the case
After the former State of Sonepur merged with India, its former Ruler was assessed on agricultural income from privately held land. He claimed that his pre-merger immunity and the merger agreement protected both his personal privileges and private property from tax, and that deletion of the express reference to a Ruler from the statutory definition of 'person' excluded him. The High Court cancelled the 1949-50 assessment and two penalty orders but sustained assessments for 1950-51 to 1952-53, which became the subject of these three appeals (SCR pp. 779-783; PDF pp. 1-5).
Source: Primary judgment: facts
02 · Discussion by the Hon’ble Court
The merger provisions guaranteed personal rights, privileges and dignities of the ex-Ruler, not tax immunity for his private property. The 1950 deletion of the obsolete express reference to a Ruler did not remove former Rulers from the ordinary inclusive term 'person', and the Act contained no exemption for the appellant. Article 362 did not create an enforceable obligation at the ex-Ruler's instance, while Article 363 barred judicial enforcement of the covenant. Separate objections about two transferred villages and the asserted eighteen-village inventory were rejected without decision because they had not been raised in the High Court (SCR pp. 783-787; PDF pp. 5-9).
Source: Primary judgment: discussion
03 · Judicial decision
Civil Appeals Nos. 307, 308 and 309 of 1958 were dismissed with costs and one hearing fee. The Court sustained the appellant's liability to agricultural income tax for the three appealed years; it did not decide the two belated village-specific objections (SCR p. 787; PDF p. 9).
Source: Primary judgment: decision
04 · Outcome / in whose favour
In favour of Revenue and the State of Orissa on the former Ruler's claimed tax immunity. The decision concerns liability under the historical State Act, not the correctness of every item or the unappealed 1949-50 assessment and penalty cancellations (SCR pp. 782-787; PDF pp. 4-9).
Source: Primary judgment: outcome
05 · AKHB REVIEW POINT
AKHB analysis: identify whether a covenant protects the person, status or the income-producing property, and then locate an express statutory exemption. A historical status reference disappearing from a definition does not itself create an exemption when the general charging language still applies. Preserve objections to the tax base and ownership in the first judicial challenge; the Court declined to examine new village-specific contentions on appeal.
Source: Primary judgment: review point
Source & verification
Download original judgment / order · Open cited source rendition
Exact 9-page catalogue PDF (SHA-256 1af9a900d05b5f0fda720146e24aeb3298ccca65eb39090cbd44659c681ff6f0) read in full through page-preserving text and rendered page images. The complete report spans SCR 779-787 with no adjacent report. Signed-report title, decision date, five-judge bench, opinion author and Civil Appeals Nos. 307-309 of 1958 were verified. No same-party, docket, citation, source-hash or standalone judgment match was found in the published collection or reviewed archives.
- Catalogue source 1961_1_779_787: SHA-256 1af9a900d05b5f0fda720146e24aeb3298ccca65eb39090cbd44659c681ff6f0, 9 pages, read and visually inspected in full.
- The published original preserves the exact catalogue bytes and verified hash.
- The source verifies identity, bench, provisions, opinion structure and operative order.
- No exact source-hash, asset-ID, SCR-citation, docket or same-judgment publication match was found.
Statutory scope
Historical Orissa agricultural-income-tax legislation and the former-Ruler/merger-agreement constitutional setting; no present exemption, constitutional or current-law treatment is certified.
Later treatment
Source checked 2026-10-11. Later judicial treatment and current statutory applicability have not been comprehensively checked; no current-law or citator clearance is represented.
Page references identify the supplied PDF; paragraph references identify the judgment unless stated otherwise.
Coverage, AI disclosure & professional disclaimer
Selected Supreme Court income-tax decisions and procedural orders checked against their identified sources. This collection is not exhaustive. The research catalogue has 2,569 indexed PDF assets, including alternate copies and incidental matches; that is not a count of unique or reviewed judgments. Historical and unreported coverage remains open.
AI-assisted research checked against the identified source. Extraction, interpretation or omission errors remain possible. Source review does not mean independent approval by a practising professional. Verify every material statement against the complete original judgment.
General research information only; not legal or tax advice, a certified judgment or a substitute for the full order. Applicability depends on facts, assessment year, statutory version and jurisdiction. Subsequent treatment is unverified unless a note expressly identifies the sources checked. Downloading does not create a professional engagement. Obtain case-specific advice before reliance.
The official 1961–2025 structural correspondence does not establish that a precedent applies under the new Act. Verify the enacted wording, commencement and transitional provisions separately.