HON’BLE SUPREME COURT · SOURCE-REVIEWED NOTE

McGregor & Balfour Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax, West Bengal

Civil Appeal No. 265 of 1956
[1959] Supp. 2 SCR 355 ·
Indian Finance Act 1946 section 11(14) · Excess Profits Tax Act 1940 section 12(2)

Reasoned final decisionRevenue

3-judge bench · B. P. Sinha · J. L. Kapur · M. Hidayatullah

Assessment years: 1947-48

01 · Facts of the case

A United Kingdom company trading also in India received repayment of UK excess-profits tax previously deducted in computing its Indian taxable profits. It challenged Indian taxation because repayment occurred outside taxable territory.

Source: Primary report: SCR 356–357

02 · Discussion by the Hon’ble Court

Section 11(14) deemed repayment income and required its treatment as income of the previous year of repayment. The statutory fiction restored the income character of amounts whose earlier deduction had reduced taxable profits and imposed the charge itself.

Source: Primary report: SCR 358–363

03 · Judicial decision

The repayment was taxable under the provision without further proof of territorial receipt beyond the specified repayment and prior deduction conditions.

Source: Primary report: SCR 363–364

04 · Outcome / in whose favour

The company’s appeal was dismissed with costs; the first referred question remained answered affirmatively.

Source: Primary report: SCR 364

05 · AKHB REVIEW POINT

The separate residence question was final because Revenue had not appealed it. The contention that the 1946 Finance Act provision did not apply to later years was not seriously pressed and was not supported by full reasons; this decision is not a general territorial-income rule.

Source: Primary report: SCR 357

Source & verification

Download original judgment / order · Open cited source rendition

Complete 10-page Supreme Court Reports scan. Any adjoining report fragments remain in the unchanged original and are excluded from this analysis.

Statutory scope

Historical legislation expressly identified in this note. This is not a decision under the Income-tax Act, 1961 or the Income-tax Act, 2025. Verify enacted wording, commencement, transition and subsequent judicial treatment independently before modern reliance.

Later treatment

Source checked 2026-10-23. Subsequent treatment and present-law applicability have not been comprehensively checked.

Page references identify the supplied PDF; paragraph references identify the judgment unless stated otherwise.

AI disclosure & professional disclaimer

This AKHB research note uses AI assistance and a preserved full-primary review, with refreshed exact original-byte verification. Independent human review is not represented.

General legal and tax research only; not legal or tax advice. Verify the complete judgment, applicable statutory version and subsequent treatment before reliance. AKHB REVIEW POINT is editorial analysis, not the Court’s holding.

Browse Hon’ble Supreme Court judgments