High Court for the State of Telangana · Procedural orders and remands
Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Hyderabad v. Coromandal Bio-Tech Industries Ltd.
I.T.T.A. No. 89/2013 ·
Revenue appeal withdrawn under Circular 9/2024, with revival reserved if Circular 5/2024 exceptions apply.
1. FACTS OF THE CASE
Revenue’s ITTA 89/2013 against Coromandal Bio-Tech Industries Ltd challenged the Tribunal’s 30 March 2012 order in ITA 289/Hyd/2007 for AY 2003-04.
2. DISCUSSION BY THE COURT
Revenue counsel requested withdrawal in view of CBDT Circular 9/2024 dated 17 September 2024 and liberty to seek revival if the appeal fell within exceptions in Circular 5/2024 dated 15 March 2024.
3. JUDICIAL DECISION
The Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn and expressly granted liberty to seek revival if the case fell within the exceptions in Circular 5/2024.
4. OUTCOME
The appeal ended without costs and pending miscellaneous applications were closed. The order contains no adjudication of the underlying tax merits or finding that a particular exception applies.
5. Expert Comments
AKHB editorial analysis, distinct from the Court’s findings.
The two circular references serve different roles
Counsel cited Circular 9/2024 as the reason for withdrawal, while the operative reservation refers to exceptions in Circular 5/2024. Keeping those references separate accurately states the Court’s conditional disposal without attempting to restate the circulars beyond this source.
Source: PDF p.2, paragraphs 1–3
Revival is a reserved possibility, not a present finding
The exception condition must be satisfied before the reservation could support a later revival request. The Court does not identify an exception, determine its applicability or automatically reopen the appeal. Nor does withdrawal affirm the Tribunal’s reasoning on merits.
Source: PDF p.2, paragraph 3
The docket limits what can be inferred
The caption and assessment year identify this dispute, but the company’s business label supplies no basis to infer the deduction, receipt or statutory controversy that reached the Tribunal.
Source: PDF pp.1–2, prayer and order
Source and verification
Complete 3-page original reviewed; source bytes verified.
Original PDF: 3 pages · SHA-256: d4d5c641fe691d0523df235c27adc61d8f522394a38a36196015559f7cdb6dcd
Full original and all five panels re-reviewed on 21 October 2026.
Current law and subsequent treatment not independently verified.
Subsequent proceedings and current judicial treatment have not been independently verified.
AI disclosure and professional disclaimer
AI-assisted source review. Independent human approval is not represented.
General research only. Read the complete judgment and verify applicable law and subsequent treatment before reliance.