Baljeet Singh @ Baljeet Singh Turke v. Income Tax Officer, ITO Ward 2(1), Chandigarh and others

1. FACTS OF THE CASE

Baljeet Singh @ Baljeet Singh Turke sought withdrawal of CWP-24374-2024, requesting liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action and also challenge section 147A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The one-page order does not identify an assessment year, impugned notice date or disputed amount.

Source: PDF p.1, paragraph 1

2. DISCUSSION BY THE COURT

The Court recorded counsel’s requested form of withdrawal. It did not examine the statutory challenge or the underlying tax dispute. The printed reference is section 147A and is retained as recorded; the order contains no explanation of that provision.

Source: PDF p.1, paragraphs 1–2

3. JUDICIAL DECISION

The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. The incorporated prayer expressly permits a fresh petition on the same cause of action, including the stated statutory challenge.

Source: PDF p.1, paragraph 2 read with paragraph 1

4. OUTCOME

CWP-24374-2024 ended on 3 September 2026 through withdrawal with liberty, rather than an adjudication of tax liability. The order contains no stay, payment direction or determination that section 147A is invalid.

Source: PDF p.1, paragraphs 1–2

5. Expert Comments

AKHB editorial analysis, distinct from the Court’s findings.

Read the liberty with the recorded prayer

For Baljeet Singh @ Baljeet Singh Turke, the operative words “with liberty as prayed for” take their content from paragraph 1. A later filing can refer to this express reservation of the same cause of action and the proposed statutory challenge. It would overstate the order to describe it as either unconditional rejection of the tax challenge or acceptance of its merits.

Source: PDF p.1, paragraphs 1–2

Withdrawal does not supply interim protection

No continuation of protection or restraint on assessment or recovery appears in this order. A fresh petition relying on the liberty must therefore distinguish permission to litigate from any separately sought interim relief; the withdrawal order itself supplies no such relief.

Source: PDF p.1, paragraphs 1–2

Preserve this separate proceeding

The identifying record is CWP-24374-2024, CNR PHHC 011281552024, neutral citation 2026:PHHC:124171-DB. Similar withdrawal wording in other petitions does not merge their parties or dockets. Neither an assessment year nor a notice date can be inferred from the 2024 case number.

Source: PDF p.1, caption and paragraphs 1–2