High Court of Orissa · Judgments and reasoned final orders

Jyotsnarani Dash v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Bhubaneswar-1 & Ors.

W.P.(C) No. 10407 of 2025 ·

Reassessment order under section 147 read with section 144B disputing capital gains and section 54F deduction for AY 2020-21: writ petition not entertained in view of statutory appellate remedy; liberty granted to appeal.

1. FACTS OF THE CASE

The petitioner challenged a reassessment order dated 12.03.2025 passed under section 147 read with section 144B for AY 2020-21 and consequential demand notice, contending that the AO had not properly considered her reply under section 148A/148 or called for evidence regarding cost of acquisition, cost of improvement, and investment in a new capital asset under section 54F.

Source: Paragraphs 1-2.3; PDF pp. 1-2

2. DISCUSSION BY THE COURT

Agreeing with the Senior Standing Counsel's objection, the Division Bench held that the petitioner's contentions regarding capital gains computation, cost of acquisition/improvement, and section 54F exemption required factual adjudication of evidence by the statutory appellate authority, which is fully competent to examine both factual materials and natural-justice grievances.

Source: Paragraphs 3-6; PDF pp. 2-4

3. JUDICIAL DECISION

Disposed of W.P.(C) No. 10407 of 2025 with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate remedy in accordance with law.

Source: Paragraphs 6-7; PDF pp. 3-4

4. OUTCOME

Revenue (on alternative remedy) - Writ petition disposed of declining interference and relegating the assessee to the statutory appellate authority.

Source: Paragraphs 6-7; PDF pp. 3-4

5. AKHB REVIEW POINT

AKHB analysis: where a reassessment order under section 147/144B turns on factual verification of capital-gains cost of improvement and section 54F reinvestment, High Courts ordinarily require the taxpayer to exhaust the section 246A appeal before NFAC.

Source: AKHB analysis based on Paragraphs 3-6; PDF pp. 2-4

Source and verification

4-page official High Court of Orissa judgment PDF (20251127_ODHC010261252025.pdf).

Original PDF: 4 pages · SHA-256: 6c58c153351c82f835cf5bc3d512fdf5e8ccafc6f34375069924fdf995cd54a0

Supplied source-reviewed note retained; original bytes and identity validation checked in this release. Substantive re-review is not claimed for this record.

Applies sections 54F, 144B, 147, 148A and 246A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for AY 2020-21. Income-tax Act, 2025 equivalence is not verified.

Full primary judgment PDF read page-by-page and verified against the AKHB Google Drive repository. Comprehensive subsequent judicial treatment has not been independently verified.

AI disclosure and professional disclaimer

AI-assisted source review. Independent human approval is not represented.

General research only. Read the complete judgment and verify applicable law and subsequent treatment before reliance.