High Court of Madhya Pradesh · Procedural orders and remands
Veerendra Kumar Pathak v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-I, Katni & Ors.
W.P. No. 5596/2023 ·
Writ withdrawn at counsel’s request; pending applications disposed of.
1. FACTS OF THE CASE
Veerendra Kumar Pathak’s petition came for admission and counsel requested withdrawal.
2. DISCUSSION BY THE COURT
The Court recorded the request without discussing the underlying tax grounds.
3. JUDICIAL DECISION
The petition was dismissed as withdrawn and pending interlocutory applications were disposed of.
4. OUTCOME
No substantive tax ruling or express fresh-proceeding liberty was recorded.
5. Expert Comments
AKHB editorial analysis, distinct from the Court’s findings.
Use the operative page rather than the caption alone
The first page identifies the parties; the actual direction is on PDF page 2. Both pages are retained and the disposition is linked to its source page.
Source: PDF p. 2
Do not infer a continuing interim order
Disposal of the interlocutory applications is expressly recorded. This short order does not grant or continue any stay.
Source: PDF p. 2
Source and verification
Complete 2-page source PDF; all pages read, including signature-only pages.
Original PDF: 2 pages · SHA-256: f1148fe68e04db035d5dc148cdd9a5f0dc4bb3af7a6bb718339977695c56178b
Complete source text and every original page visually reviewed; identity and SHA-256 checked. AI-assisted source analysis.
No assessment year, tax amount or substantive Income-tax Act provision is identified or decided in this supplied short order.
Subsequent judicial treatment has not been independently verified.
AI disclosure and professional disclaimer
AI-assisted source review. Independent human approval is not represented.
General research only. Read the complete judgment and verify applicable law and subsequent treatment before reliance.