High Court of Madhya Pradesh · Procedural orders and remands
Anurag Agrawal v. Income Tax Officer-5(1), Indore & Anr.
W.P. No. 11030/2022 ·
Writ dismissed as infructuous after counsel reported that the grievance had been redressed.
1. FACTS OF THE CASE
Anurag Agrawal’s counsel stated that the grievance had already been redressed during the pendency of the writ.
2. DISCUSSION BY THE COURT
The Court acted on that statement and did not describe the action providing redress or decide a substantive tax issue.
3. JUDICIAL DECISION
The writ petition was dismissed as having become infructuous.
4. OUTCOME
The pending proceeding ended on reported redress; no separate merits relief can be inferred.
5. Expert Comments
AKHB editorial analysis, distinct from the Court’s findings.
Attribute the redress to counsel’s statement
The source does not identify a refund, assessment revision or monetary amount. The underlying act of redress requires its own record.
Source: PDF p. 1
Infructuous disposal is not affirmation of the tax action
The Court ended a proceeding said to lack a surviving grievance. It did not adjudicate the original challenge for or against either party.
Source: PDF p. 1
Source and verification
Complete 2-page source PDF; all pages read, including signature-only pages.
Original PDF: 2 pages · SHA-256: 0963dd8a90b496d2777d85172267a96d88304491e90e4fcd8acb2beaa9d954d1
Complete source text and every original page visually reviewed; identity and SHA-256 checked. AI-assisted source analysis.
No assessment year, tax amount or substantive Income-tax Act provision is identified or decided in this supplied short order.
Subsequent judicial treatment has not been independently verified.
AI disclosure and professional disclaimer
AI-assisted source review. Independent human approval is not represented.
General research only. Read the complete judgment and verify applicable law and subsequent treatment before reliance.