High Court of Madhya Pradesh · Procedural orders and remands
Smt. Seema Bhattacharya v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Jabalpur
Review Petition No. 331/2021 ·
Review petition dismissed as withdrawn at counsel’s request.
1. FACTS OF THE CASE
Seema Bhattacharya’s review petition came before the Division Bench. Counsel requested withdrawal.
2. DISCUSSION BY THE COURT
The order records the request without discussing the earlier decision or the grounds for review.
3. JUDICIAL DECISION
The review petition was dismissed as withdrawn and the pending interlocutory application disposed of accordingly.
4. OUTCOME
Review proceedings ended by withdrawal; no fresh merits ruling or express liberty was recorded.
5. Expert Comments
AKHB editorial analysis, distinct from the Court’s findings.
Withdrawal does not decide the review grounds
The supplied order contains no analysis of error apparent or the underlying tax controversy. It cannot support an inferred rejection of those grounds on merits.
Source: PDF p. 1
Retain the whole original
The original has two physical pages; the second contains no additional substantive direction. The complete PDF is preserved rather than treating the second page as another case.
Source: PDF p. 2
Source and verification
Complete 2-page source PDF; all pages read, including signature-only pages.
Original PDF: 2 pages · SHA-256: 32375bf7e8553a6f214f0ba51f0933dc360628f4bb24ff0cce86e59b1b3912c3
Complete source text and every original page visually reviewed; identity and SHA-256 checked. AI-assisted source analysis.
The supplied order does not identify an assessment year or decide an Income-tax Act charging provision. No unstated provision is assigned.
Subsequent judicial treatment has not been independently verified.
AI disclosure and professional disclaimer
AI-assisted source review. Independent human approval is not represented.
General research only. Read the complete judgment and verify applicable law and subsequent treatment before reliance.