High Court of Karnataka · Procedural orders and remands
Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. v. H.B. Datar (through legal representatives)
I.T.A. No. 966/2006 ·
Revenue appeal abated after failure to substitute representatives of a deceased legal representative.
1. FACTS OF THE CASE
Revenue challenged the Tribunal’s 23 December 2005 order in ITA 134/Bang/2002 concerning H. B. Datar. The caption lists his legal representatives. At hearing, Revenue counsel reported that the first representative, Manjunath H. Datar, had died on 10 March 2013.
2. DISCUSSION BY THE COURT
The Court recorded that steps had not been taken within the prescribed time to bring the deceased first representative’s legal representatives on record.
3. JUDICIAL DECISION
The appeal was dismissed as abated.
4. OUTCOME
The disposal was procedural, without determination of the tax questions. The caption also attributes 10 March 2013 to H. B. Datar’s death, while the operative narrative attributes that date to Manjunath; the inconsistency is preserved rather than reconciled by assumption.
5. Expert Comments
AKHB editorial analysis, distinct from the Court’s findings.
Substitution obligations can arise again
The procedural failure concerned the death of a person already appearing as a legal representative. Bringing representatives on record once did not resolve the later need identified by the Court. The operative finding focuses on the missed substitution within time.
Source: PDF pp.2–3
Abatement does not decide assessment correctness
Although the appeal challenged Tribunal relief, the Court did not examine the assessment grounds or formulate a substantive tax rule. The surviving effect of the Tribunal order follows from disposal of the challenge, not an independent High Court endorsement of its reasoning.
Source: PDF pp.2–3
Separate the recorded event from inconsistent caption dates
For procedural history, the reliable operative account is counsel’s report about Manjunath and the failure to substitute his representatives. The source’s conflicting death recital requires corroboration before either individual’s complete death chronology is asserted.
Source: PDF pp.1–3
Source and verification
Complete 3-page original reviewed; source bytes verified.
Original PDF: 3 pages · SHA-256: e25719d5897b3b61f4a5ece7d74b478fb811b1a61587a48d4edce9fa3cc312f5
Full original and all five panels re-reviewed on 21 October 2026.
Current law and subsequent treatment not independently verified.
Subsequent proceedings and current judicial treatment have not been independently verified.
AI disclosure and professional disclaimer
AI-assisted source review. Independent human approval is not represented.
General research only. Read the complete judgment and verify applicable law and subsequent treatment before reliance.
