High Court of Karnataka · Procedural orders and remands

Sri Jihveshwara Credit Co-operative Society Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-II & Anr.

Review Petition No. 812 of 2013 in WP No. 38337 of 2013 ·

Review rejected because no ground to revisit the earlier writ order was made out.

1. FACTS OF THE CASE

Sri Jihveshwara Credit Co-operative Society sought review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC of the order dated 19 September 2013 in WP 38337/2013.

Source: PDF p. 2

2. DISCUSSION BY THE COURT

The Court stated that no ground was made out to review the earlier order. The supplied two-page decision does not reproduce that order or its substantive tax reasoning.

Source: PDF p. 2

3. JUDICIAL DECISION

The review petition was rejected.

Source: PDF p. 2

4. OUTCOME

The earlier writ order was left unchanged; the review order gives no independent tax-merits holding.

Source: PDF p. 2

5. Expert Comments

AKHB editorial analysis, distinct from the Court’s findings.

Keep the review and original writ distinct

This record concerns RP 812/2013 decided on 12 November 2013. It should not replace or duplicate the separate 19 September writ decision.

Source: PDF p. 2

Do not infer a deduction or exemption ruling

The petitioner’s status as a credit society does not establish that a particular Income-tax Act provision was decided. None is identified in this operative review order.

Source: PDF p. 2

The short reason defines the note’s limits

The Court records absence of review grounds without elaboration. A fuller merits analysis would require the original writ judgment and cannot be invented from this PDF.

Source: PDF p. 2

Source and verification

Complete 2-page supplied source; all pages read.

Original PDF: 2 pages · SHA-256: 695b24da1c00923e7065d536a0dc31d9da2ef1c42aa78ec2d8457250bde41378

Complete source text and every original page visually reviewed; identity and SHA-256 checked. AI-assisted source analysis.

Only source-supported provisions are indexed; no Income-tax Act, 2025 equivalence is asserted.

Subsequent judicial treatment has not been independently verified.

AI disclosure and professional disclaimer

AI-assisted source review. Independent human approval is not represented.

General research only. Read the complete judgment and verify applicable law and subsequent treatment before reliance.