High Court of Karnataka · Procedural orders and remands
Sri Jihveshwara Credit Co-operative Society Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-II & Anr.
Review Petition No. 812 of 2013 in WP No. 38337 of 2013 ·
Review rejected because no ground to revisit the earlier writ order was made out.
1. FACTS OF THE CASE
Sri Jihveshwara Credit Co-operative Society sought review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC of the order dated 19 September 2013 in WP 38337/2013.
2. DISCUSSION BY THE COURT
The Court stated that no ground was made out to review the earlier order. The supplied two-page decision does not reproduce that order or its substantive tax reasoning.
3. JUDICIAL DECISION
The review petition was rejected.
4. OUTCOME
The earlier writ order was left unchanged; the review order gives no independent tax-merits holding.
5. Expert Comments
AKHB editorial analysis, distinct from the Court’s findings.
Keep the review and original writ distinct
This record concerns RP 812/2013 decided on 12 November 2013. It should not replace or duplicate the separate 19 September writ decision.
Source: PDF p. 2
Do not infer a deduction or exemption ruling
The petitioner’s status as a credit society does not establish that a particular Income-tax Act provision was decided. None is identified in this operative review order.
Source: PDF p. 2
The short reason defines the note’s limits
The Court records absence of review grounds without elaboration. A fuller merits analysis would require the original writ judgment and cannot be invented from this PDF.
Source: PDF p. 2
Source and verification
Complete 2-page supplied source; all pages read.
Original PDF: 2 pages · SHA-256: 695b24da1c00923e7065d536a0dc31d9da2ef1c42aa78ec2d8457250bde41378
Complete source text and every original page visually reviewed; identity and SHA-256 checked. AI-assisted source analysis.
Only source-supported provisions are indexed; no Income-tax Act, 2025 equivalence is asserted.
Subsequent judicial treatment has not been independently verified.
AI disclosure and professional disclaimer
AI-assisted source review. Independent human approval is not represented.
General research only. Read the complete judgment and verify applicable law and subsequent treatment before reliance.
