High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · Procedural and interlocutory orders
Shaheen Farooq v. Union of India & Ors.
WP(C) No. 889/2025 & CM(2330/2025) ·
Expeditious appellate disposal directed; assessment and related proceedings stayed until appeal disposal.
1. FACTS OF THE CASE
Shaheen Farooq sought relief concerning an appeal against proceedings culminating in the assessment dated 9 March 2024. Counsel relied on the 25 March 2025 order in Sheikh Zamin, WP(C)657/2025, seeking similar treatment. The Court noted that the appeal claimed to have been filed about a year earlier needed consideration without further delay.
2. DISCUSSION BY THE COURT
Having regard to the pending appeal and the relief sought, the Court directed appellate consideration with reasonable dispatch. It did not decide the correctness of the assessment or adjudicate the grounds of appeal.
3. JUDICIAL DECISION
The Appellate Authority must take up and dispose of the appeal with reasonable dispatch. Until the appeal is taken up and disposed of, the assessment dated 9 March 2024 and all subsequent proceedings are stayed. The writ was disposed of.
4. OUTCOME
The petitioner obtained protection until appellate disposal and a direction for prompt consideration. The assessment was stayed, not quashed; the appellate merits remain undecided.
5. Expert Comments
AKHB editorial analysis, distinct from the Court’s findings.
The appeal must be decided, not merely listed
The stay’s stated endpoint combines taking up and disposing of the appeal. Merely listing it is not the endpoint described. Protection covers the identified assessment and subsequent proceedings, rather than an unspecified universal restraint on all tax action.
Source: PDF p.2
Reasonable dispatch supplies no numerical deadline
The Court required prompt disposal without setting a fixed number of weeks or months. A case note should preserve that wording. The order also does not declare the appeal allowed if the authority delays or determine the amount legally payable.
Source: PDF p.2
Identify the correct appeal before using the protection
The source identifies the 9 March 2024 assessment but does not supply an assessment year or precise appeal filing date. The comparison with Sheikh Zamin supports similar procedural treatment; it does not import that other taxpayer’s facts or a substantive tax holding.
Source and verification
2-page official High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh judgment PDF (20250425_JKHC010017812025.pdf, 233,313 bytes).
Original PDF: 2 pages · SHA-256: cc6df011808c90f4d99ba561ea1772a125cc05a13372e3eebd47a1d4c8258a17
All 2 original pages read and visually inspected; all five panels audited.
No numbered tax provision is identified. The order addresses delayed appellate disposal and temporary protection, not substantive liability.
Subsequent treatment has not been independently verified.
AI disclosure and professional disclaimer
AI-assisted source review. Independent human approval is not represented.
General research only. Expert Comments are editorial analysis, not the Court’s holding. No current-law clearance is claimed.
