Gauhati High Court · Judgments and reasoned final orders

Dibrugarh Lions Brahmaputra Foundation v. The Union of India and 6 Ors.

WP(C)/4222/2026 ·

Where CPC's section 143(1) intimation raised a Rs. 57,27,614 demand for AY 2017-18 against a registered charitable eye-hospital trust for non-attachment of Form 10B and the trust's e-filed section 154 rectification application was not visible on ITBA due to a technical glitch, authorities directed to accept hard-copy Form 10B and decide rectification under section 154(4) while keeping demand in abeyance.

1. FACTS OF THE CASE

Dibrugarh Lions Brahmaputra Foundation, a charitable trust registered under sections 12A/12AA and 80G running Lion K.K. Saharia Eye Hospital in Dibrugarh, was served with an intimation dated 25.03.2019 under section 143(1) for AY 2017-18 disallowing its section 11 exemption and raising a demand of Rs. 57,27,614 solely because the audit report in Form 10B was not found attached with its e-filed return. Pursuant to a departmental communication dated 22.11.2024 advising the trust either to pay the demand or file a rectification application, the trust filed an online rectification application on 23.08.2025 (Acknowledgement No. 829929080230825), which remained undecided because an e-filing/ITBA technical glitch prevented it from reflecting on the ITBA system.

Source:

2. DISCUSSION BY THE COURT

Senior Standing Counsel for the Department confirmed on instructions that although the receipt of the rectification application on 23.08.2025 was admitted, technical problems prevented it from reflecting on the ITBA portal, and suggested that the trust submit a physical copy of Form 10B and the rectification application before Respondents No. 4 and 5 (PCIT Shillong and ITO Ward-2 (Exemption), Shillong) to facilitate disposal under section 154(4).

Source:

3. JUDICIAL DECISION

The Gauhati High Court disposed of WP(C)/4222/2026 by directing the petitioner to file hard copies of Form 10B for AY 2017-18 and the rectification application dated 23.08.2025 before Respondents No. 4 and 5 within 15 days, directing the authorities to dispose of the rectification application by a written order under section 154(4), and ordering that the Rs. 57,27,614 demand from 25.03.2019 onwards shall abide by the rectification order.

Source:

4. OUTCOME

In favour of the assessee (Dibrugarh Lions Brahmaputra Foundation); manual/hard-copy consideration of Form 10B and section 154 rectification directed, with Rs. 57,27,614 demand made subject to the rectification order.

Source:

5. AKHB REVIEW POINT

AKHB analysis: When an e-filed section 154 rectification application (bearing a valid e-Filing acknowledgement number) fails to migrate to the jurisdictional officer's ITBA worklist due to portal integration glitches, the High Court will direct the JAO (Exemption) to act on physical copies of Form 10B and the rectification application under section 154(4).

Source:

Source and verification

Reviewed from the complete 6-page official High Court judgment PDF (20260827_GAHC010160642026.pdf, SHA-256: 782099426809b90a14c4e4d16b74515d33df17ec6654d2678b221eaeff64d9a6).

Original PDF: 6 pages · SHA-256: 782099426809b90a14c4e4d16b74515d33df17ec6654d2678b221eaeff64d9a6

Supplied source-reviewed note retained; original bytes and identity validation checked in this release. Substantive re-review is not claimed for this record.

Refers to the Income-tax Act, 1961 and allied statutory rules/circulars as applicable to the relevant assessment years.

No subsequent Supreme Court reversal or stay is recorded in the source judgment text.

AI disclosure and professional disclaimer

AI-assisted source review. Independent human approval is not represented.

General research only. Read the complete judgment and verify applicable law and subsequent treatment before reliance.