High Court at Calcutta · Judgments and reasoned final orders
Dipak Samanta v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 47(2) & Ors.
WPA 1633 of 2025 ·
Corrigendum order in WPA 1633 of 2025 correcting counsel names and substituting 'Income Tax Authority' / 'Income Tax' in place of 'CGST authority' / 'CGST' in the order dated 11.06.2025.
1. FACTS OF THE CASE
WPA 1633 of 2025 (Dipak Samanta v. ITO, Ward 47(2) & Ors.) was listed at the instance of the petitioner on 20.06.2025 to correct typographical errors in the earlier order dated 11.06.2025, which had inadvertently recorded the respondents' counsel as appearing for the 'CGST authority' and printed 'CGST' in paragraph 5 at page 2.
2. DISCUSSION BY THE COURT
The Single Judge directed correction of the spelling of petitioner's counsel (Mr. Abhijat Das and Ms. Aratrika Roy) and ordered that 'CGST authority' in the appearance and 'CGST' in the second line of paragraph 5 at page 2 of the order dated 11.06.2025 be substituted with 'Income Tax Authority' and 'Income Tax' respectively.
3. JUDICIAL DECISION
Directed the department to carry out the corrections in the order dated 11.06.2025 while leaving the remainder of that order unaltered.
4. OUTCOME
Assessee (corrigendum allowed) - Typographical references to 'CGST' in the order dated 11.06.2025 corrected to 'Income Tax'.
5. AKHB REVIEW POINT
AKHB analysis: read together with the main order dated 11.06.2025 in WPA 1633 of 2025.
Source and verification
2-page official High Court at Calcutta judgment PDF (20250611_WBCHCA0029802025__preserved_85af81f3262e_1.pdf).
Original PDF: 2 pages · SHA-256: 85af81f3262e4353388ef4dc86b1824bf9dd04cfc11934e259b742927863e023
Supplied source-reviewed note retained; original bytes and identity validation checked in this release. Substantive re-review is not claimed for this record.
Corrigendum order in WPA 1633 of 2025. Income-tax Act, 2025 equivalence is not verified.
Full primary judgment PDF read page-by-page and verified against the AKHB Google Drive repository. Comprehensive subsequent judicial treatment has not been independently verified.
AI disclosure and professional disclaimer
AI-assisted source review. Independent human approval is not represented.
General research only. Read the complete judgment and verify applicable law and subsequent treatment before reliance.