High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) · Judgments and reasoned final orders

Harinath Sangramappa Kalpe v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1 & Ors.

Writ Petition No. 276 of 2026 ·

Section 148 notice issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer set aside following Hexaware Technologies Ltd.

1. FACTS OF THE CASE

The petitioner, Harinath Sangramappa Kalpe, challenged a notice under section 148 issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (ITO Ward 1) after 29.03.2022.

Source:

2. DISCUSSION BY THE COURT

Applying Hexaware Technologies Ltd. v. ACIT, (2024) 162 taxmann.com 225 (Bombay), and declining to follow the Delhi High Court's concurrent-jurisdiction ruling in T.K.S. Builders Pvt. Ltd., the Division Bench held that only the FAO can issue a section 148 notice after 29.03.2022.

Source:

3. JUDICIAL DECISION

The Court set aside the impugned section 148 notice and all emanating proceedings/orders, granting conditional praecipe revival liberty to the Revenue depending on the Supreme Court's decision in Hexaware Technologies Ltd.

Source:

4. OUTCOME

In favour of the assessee (Harinath Sangramappa Kalpe); section 148 notice set aside.

Source:

5. AKHB REVIEW POINT

AKHB analysis: Consistent application of Hexaware Technologies Ltd. by the Bombay High Court ensures that any section 148 notice issued by a local ward/circle JAO after 29.03.2022 is set aside along with all consequential orders.

Source:

Source and verification

Reviewed from the complete 3-page official High Court judgment PDF (20260128_HCBM030509162025.pdf, SHA-256: 06140dbe96292669ce2f61d322d5687ccc9d8f27776b975babe61fe0dc589b5d).

Original PDF: 3 pages · SHA-256: 06140dbe96292669ce2f61d322d5687ccc9d8f27776b975babe61fe0dc589b5d

Supplied source-reviewed note retained; original bytes and identity validation checked in this release. Substantive re-review is not claimed for this record.

Refers to the Income-tax Act, 1961 and allied statutory rules/circulars as applicable to the relevant assessment years.

No subsequent Supreme Court reversal or stay is recorded in the source judgment text.

AI disclosure and professional disclaimer

AI-assisted source review. Independent human approval is not represented.

General research only. Read the complete judgment and verify applicable law and subsequent treatment before reliance.