The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Nagpur v. The Akola Janta Commercial Cooperative Bank Ltd., Akola

1. FACTS OF THE CASE

Revenue filed a pursis dated 25 August 2025 stating that it did not wish to prosecute ITA 35/2022 against Akola Janta Commercial Cooperative Bank. It sought permission to withdraw and refund of court fees under the rules.

Source: PDF p. 1

2. DISCUSSION BY THE COURT

The Court granted permission. The order does not give a monetary-limit reason, circular, assessment year or underlying tax issue.

Source: PDF p. 1

3. JUDICIAL DECISION

The appeal was disposed of as withdrawn; court fees were to be refunded in accordance with the rules.

Source: PDF p. 1

4. OUTCOME

Withdrawal of Revenue’s appeal without a substantive determination.

Source: PDF p. 1

5. Expert Comments

AKHB editorial analysis, distinct from the Court’s findings.

Do not import a low-tax-effect explanation

The pursis is described as an instruction not to prosecute. The source does not identify a monetary limit or circular, so such a reason cannot be inferred from the fact of withdrawal.

Source: PDF p. 1

The tax question remains unaddressed here

Neither a deduction nor the cooperative bank’s tax liability is decided. This procedural order should not be cited as a substantive precedent on those matters.

Source: PDF p. 1

The refund direction is limited

Court-fee refund under the rules is expressly granted. The order contains no direction to refund tax or interest and no express revival liberty.

Source: PDF p. 1