ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT · SOURCE-REVIEWED INTERIM ORDER
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Lucknow v. Rupali Mittal
INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 8 of 2025 ·
Supplied court order; reported citation not indexed
Notice was issued, steps were due within a week, the office was to provide dasti, and listing was fixed for 27 November 2025.
Division Bench · Shekhar B. Saraf · Prashant Kumar
1. Facts of the case
The Revenue appeal came before the Bench for service directions.
2. Discussion by the Hon’ble Court
The Court required normal service supplemented by personal dasti service.
3. Judicial decision
Notice was issued, steps were due within a week, the office was to provide dasti, and listing was fixed for 27 November 2025.
4. Outcome / in whose favour
The appeal remained at notice stage.
5. Expert Comments
AKHB editorial analysis, distinct from the Court’s findings. Subsequent treatment and current-law applicability have not been verified.
Two service routes were required
Normal service was expressly supplemented by personal dasti service, with the office to supply the process and steps due within one week. The directions concern bringing Rupali Mittal before the Court; they do not record that service had already been completed.
Source: PDF p.1 · PDF 1
Notice leaves the substantive appeal unresolved
The listing on 27 November 2025 is a procedural milestone. No question of law is admitted or answered and no stay is granted in this order. Neither the assessment year nor the tax issue can be inferred from the parties’ names or another appeal involving the same respondent.
Source: PDF p.1 · PDF 1
Source and verification
Complete supplied 1-page original read and every page visually inspected; original PDF bytes verified by SHA-256 against the review ledger. Only source-identified provisions and assessment years are indexed. No PAN is stated. No current-law clearance is claimed.
Source SHA-256: d97c39f5dfc5d706e2fd9ed507ea3b716d07ed47da02bfeb5cc5449098b1e1ba
Only source-identified provisions are recorded. No current monetary threshold, current statutory equivalence or 2025 Act applicability is inferred.
Source checked 2026-10-21. Subsequent proceedings and current precedential treatment have not been comprehensively verified.
AI disclosure and professional disclaimer
This AKHB research note was prepared with AI assistance from an identified primary report. Independent human review is not represented.
General legal and tax research only; not legal or tax advice. Verify the complete judgment, applicable statutory version and subsequent treatment before reliance. The AKHB Expert Comments is editorial analysis, not the Court’s holding. No current-law clearance is claimed.