ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT · SOURCE-REVIEWED PROCEDURAL ORDER
Time Today Media Network Pvt. Ltd. Thru. Director Adarsh Singh Kushwah v. Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Finance Deptt. Income Tax New Delhi And 2 Others
Writ Tax No. 240 Of 2024 ·
2025:AHC-LKO:17464-DB
the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Division Bench · Rajan Roy · Om Prakash Shukla
1. Facts of the case
Time Today Media Network requested withdrawal through counsel.
2. Discussion by the Hon’ble Court
The Bench accepted the withdrawal request without examining the underlying tax merits.
3. Judicial decision
the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Outcome / in whose favour
The proceeding ended at the requesting party’s instance.
5. Expert Comments
AKHB editorial analysis, distinct from the Court’s findings. Subsequent treatment and current-law applicability have not been verified.
Withdrawal in this docket carries no express fresh liberty
Time Today Media Network requested withdrawal of Writ Tax 240/2024 and the Court accepted it. Unlike the company’s separately numbered September 2024 writ disposals, this order does not expressly permit filing afresh.
Source: PDF p.1 · PDF p.1, complete supplied order
Different Time Today proceedings have different effects
The same company appears in several reopening matters, but Writ Tax 240/2024 should not acquire the relief or reasoning of Writ Tax 241/2024 or the earlier 223/224 proceedings. This source contains no assessment year, merits reasoning or stay and does not disclose why withdrawal was chosen.
Source: PDF p.1 · PDF p.1, complete supplied order
Source and verification
Complete supplied 1-page original read and all source page images visually inspected; original bytes verified by SHA-256 against the ledger. No PAN is stated. Subsequent treatment and current law have not been cleared.
Source SHA-256: 45dfc7d2b83a4058687d76e9a462fa9c480560db7e9dc0bb3ca6cd27bcf7808f
Only source-identified provisions are recorded. No current monetary threshold, current statutory equivalence or 2025 Act applicability is inferred.
Source checked 2026-10-21. Subsequent proceedings and current precedential treatment have not been comprehensively verified.
AI disclosure and professional disclaimer
This AKHB research note was prepared with AI assistance from an identified primary report. Independent human review is not represented.
General legal and tax research only; not legal or tax advice. Verify the complete judgment, applicable statutory version and subsequent treatment before reliance. The Expert Comments section is editorial analysis, not the Court’s holding. No current-law clearance is claimed.