ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT · SOURCE-REVIEWED PROCEDURAL ORDER
Shri Ram Ply Product Sitapur Thru. Partner Shri Arun Kumar Jindal v. Assessment Unit Income Tax Deptt. National Faceless Asst. Centre , New Delhi And Others
Writ Tax No. 29 Of 2023 ·
2025:AHC-LKO:13883-DB
The withdrawal application was allowed and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Division Bench · Rajan Roy · Om Prakash Shukla
1. Facts of the case
Shri Ram Ply Product requested withdrawal through counsel. C.M. Application 5/2025 was supported by affidavit.
2. Discussion by the Hon’ble Court
The Bench accepted the withdrawal request without examining the underlying tax merits.
3. Judicial decision
The withdrawal application was allowed and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Outcome / in whose favour
The proceeding ended at the requesting party’s instance.
5. Expert Comments
AKHB editorial analysis, distinct from the Court’s findings. Subsequent treatment and current-law applicability have not been verified.
An affidavit-supported withdrawal ended the writ
C.M. Application 5/2025 sought withdrawal of Shri Ram Ply Product’s writ and was supported by an affidavit. After hearing both sides the Court allowed the application and dismissed Writ Tax 29/2023 as withdrawn. The order does not disclose the reason for abandoning the challenge.
Source: PDF p.1 · PDF p.1, complete supplied order
The assessment unit caption does not supply a jurisdiction ruling
The reference to the National Faceless Assessment Centre identifies a respondent; it is not a determination about faceless procedure or assessment validity. No settlement, refiling liberty or substantive tax concession is recorded. Use the order for the withdrawal history rather than a tax proposition.
Source: PDF p.1 · PDF p.1, complete supplied order
Source and verification
Complete supplied 1-page original read and all source page images visually inspected; original bytes verified by SHA-256 against the ledger. No PAN is stated. Subsequent treatment and current law have not been cleared.
Source SHA-256: ed2034bb7270250c21964baef6acec05e8cd2f41810510886a1e412937eaa2fd
Only source-identified provisions are recorded. No current monetary threshold, current statutory equivalence or 2025 Act applicability is inferred.
Source checked 2026-10-21. Subsequent proceedings and current precedential treatment have not been comprehensively verified.
AI disclosure and professional disclaimer
This AKHB research note was prepared with AI assistance from an identified primary report. Independent human review is not represented.
General legal and tax research only; not legal or tax advice. Verify the complete judgment, applicable statutory version and subsequent treatment before reliance. The Expert Comments section is editorial analysis, not the Court’s holding. No current-law clearance is claimed.