ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT · SOURCE-REVIEWED INTERIM / PROCEDURAL ORDER
Ajay Kumar Singh v. Principal Commissioner Of Income And 2 Others
WRIT TAX No. 1661 of 2024 ·
Supplied court order; no reported citation stated
List 25 November 2024.
Division Bench · Shekhar B. Saraf · Vipin Chandra Dixit
1. Facts of the case
The writ was placed before the Division Bench.
2. Discussion by the Hon’ble Court
No underlying facts or reasons are recorded in this scheduling order.
3. Judicial decision
List 25 November 2024.
4. Outcome / in whose favour
The matter remained pending.
5. Expert Comments
AKHB editorial analysis, distinct from the Court’s findings. Subsequent treatment and current-law applicability have not been verified.
Only a listing date was fixed
Ajay Kumar Singh’s Writ Tax 1661/2024 was directed to be listed on 25 November 2024. The source contains no account of the tax issue, arguments, pending application or reasons for choosing that date.
Source: PDF p.1 · PDF p.1, complete supplied order
A scheduling record has a limited use
Use this order to trace the proceeding’s calendar. It supplies no basis to assert admission, dismissal, stay, extension of earlier protection or a legal proposition about the tax dispute. Those matters require the relevant orders rather than an inference from the case being listed.
Source: PDF p.1 · PDF p.1, complete supplied order
Source and verification
Complete supplied 1-page original read and visually inspected; original bytes independently SHA-256 verified against source map and ledger. No present-law or subsequent-treatment clearance is claimed.
Source SHA-256: 5e216b86b5f8bd3cf50823d6bed805932f25b42acd61d6d74704b1faa4e3d866
Only source-identified provisions are recorded. No current monetary threshold, current statutory equivalence or 2025 Act applicability is inferred.
Source checked 2026-10-21. Subsequent proceedings and current precedential treatment have not been comprehensively verified.
AI disclosure and professional disclaimer
This AKHB research note was prepared with AI assistance from an identified primary report. Independent human review is not represented.
General legal and tax research only; not legal or tax advice. Verify the complete judgment, applicable statutory version and subsequent treatment before reliance. The Expert Comments section is editorial analysis, not the Court’s holding. No current-law clearance is claimed.