ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT · SOURCE-REVIEWED INTERIM / PROCEDURAL ORDER

Jai Jagdamba Scrap Suppliers Ltd. Thru. Director Ankit Mehndiratta v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax/Assistant Commissioner Income Tax Lko. And Others

WRIT TAX No. 112 of 2024 ·
Supplied court order; no reported citation stated

List next week as fresh; petitioner to file the supplementary affidavit with the Board resolution meanwhile.

Division Bench · Sangeeta Chandra · Brij Raj Singh

1. Facts of the case

The company’s petition was before the Court at the fresh stage.

Source: PDF p.1

2. Discussion by the Hon’ble Court

The Court required a supplementary affidavit supported by the Board’s resolution.

Source: PDF p.1

3. Judicial decision

List next week as fresh; petitioner to file the supplementary affidavit with the Board resolution meanwhile.

Source: PDF p.1

4. Outcome / in whose favour

The petition remained pending.

Source: PDF p.1

5. Expert Comments

AKHB editorial analysis, distinct from the Court’s findings. Subsequent treatment and current-law applicability have not been verified.

The next step was a corporate document

Jai Jagdamba Scrap Suppliers was directed to file a supplementary affidavit with the Board’s resolution before a fresh listing the following week. The Court required that material without deciding the company’s tax claim or expressly declaring the existing filing unauthorized.

Source: PDF p.1 · PDF p.1, complete supplied order

The resolution has a procedural role here

For this case history, record the affidavit and resolution as the directed filing rather than a merits condition on tax relief. The source does not reproduce the resolution, say it was subsequently filed or grant a stay. Corporate authorization and the underlying tax challenge remain distinct questions.

Source: PDF p.1 · PDF p.1, complete supplied order

Source and verification

Complete supplied 1-page original read and visually inspected; original bytes independently SHA-256 verified against source map and ledger. No present-law or subsequent-treatment clearance is claimed.

Source SHA-256: d398548ea98a7b45f1ecf94b3193f4414251d02400f50f082751d1b5dea1885a

Only source-identified provisions are recorded. No current monetary threshold, current statutory equivalence or 2025 Act applicability is inferred.

Source checked 2026-10-21. Subsequent proceedings and current precedential treatment have not been comprehensively verified.

AI disclosure and professional disclaimer

This AKHB research note was prepared with AI assistance from an identified primary report. Independent human review is not represented.

General legal and tax research only; not legal or tax advice. Verify the complete judgment, applicable statutory version and subsequent treatment before reliance. The Expert Comments section is editorial analysis, not the Court’s holding. No current-law clearance is claimed.