ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT · SOURCE-REVIEWED PROCEDURAL ORDER

Rakesh Kumar Tripathi v. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Lucknow

Writ-C No. 4350 of 2023 ·
2023:AHC-LKO:37810-DB

The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Division Bench · Rajan Roy · Manish Kumar

1. Facts of the case

After arguing at some length, petitioner counsel requested withdrawal of the writ petition.

Source: PDF p.1, complete supplied order

2. Discussion by the Hon’ble Court

The Court allowed the withdrawal request without addressing the underlying tax dispute in the supplied order.

Source: PDF p.1, complete supplied order

3. Judicial decision

The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Source: PDF p.1, complete supplied order

4. Outcome / in whose favour

The proceeding ended by withdrawal without a merits adjudication.

Source: PDF p.1, complete supplied order

5. AKHB REVIEW POINT

The order grants withdrawal but no express liberty to file afresh. It identifies no assessment year, tax amount or statutory provision. The neutral citation and printed order date are preserved.

Source: PDF p.1, complete supplied order

Source and verification

Complete supplied one-page original read and visually inspected; original PDF bytes verified by SHA-256. Only source-identified provisions and assessment years are recorded. No PAN is stated. Subsequent treatment and current law have not been cleared.

Source SHA-256: e75616fd9cae9c30deb725f82bcaf9b80b621ee82b851a110568f9874e54cb61

Only source-identified provisions are recorded. No current monetary threshold, current statutory equivalence or 2025 Act applicability is inferred.

Source checked 2026-10-20. Subsequent proceedings and current precedential treatment have not been comprehensively verified.

AI disclosure and professional disclaimer

This AKHB research note was prepared with AI assistance from an identified primary report. Independent human review is not represented.

General legal and tax research only; not legal or tax advice. Verify the complete judgment, applicable statutory version and subsequent treatment before reliance. The AKHB REVIEW POINT is editorial analysis, not the Court’s holding. No current-law clearance is claimed.