ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT · SOURCE-REVIEWED PROCEDURAL ORDER
Tulsi Gramodyog Seva Samiti, Lucknow through its President v. Abhay Kumar Singh, Commissioner of Income Tax Exemption, Lucknow
Contempt Application (Civil) No. 2054 of 2021 ·
Supplied court order; no reported citation stated
The contempt application was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Single Judge · Rajeev Singh
1. Facts of the case
No one appeared to press the contempt application. The Court found from the order sheet that the applicant was reluctant to pursue the case.
2. Discussion by the Hon’ble Court
The Court dismissed the application for non-prosecution without determining compliance with any underlying order.
3. Judicial decision
The contempt application was dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Outcome / in whose favour
The contempt proceeding ended procedurally; no contempt punishment or compliance finding is supplied.
5. AKHB REVIEW POINT
The underlying order and statutory tax issue are not identified in this short disposal. Do not infer registration, exemption, compliance or wilful disobedience from the party designations or dismissal.
Source and verification
Complete supplied one-page original read and visually inspected; original PDF bytes verified by SHA-256. Only source-identified provisions and assessment years are recorded. No PAN is stated. Subsequent treatment and current law have not been cleared.
Source SHA-256: 214f6d1d79e4f4f8169ae88bcb466981025726bc8b1515b0317638436d0a7af4
Only source-identified provisions are recorded. No current monetary threshold, current statutory equivalence or 2025 Act applicability is inferred.
Source checked 2026-10-20. Subsequent proceedings and current precedential treatment have not been comprehensively verified.
AI disclosure and professional disclaimer
This AKHB research note was prepared with AI assistance from an identified primary report. Independent human review is not represented.
General legal and tax research only; not legal or tax advice. Verify the complete judgment, applicable statutory version and subsequent treatment before reliance. The AKHB REVIEW POINT is editorial analysis, not the Court’s holding. No current-law clearance is claimed.