ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT · SOURCE-REVIEWED PROCEDURAL ORDER
Harish Chandra Bhati v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax and others
Civil Misc. Review Application No. 315 of 2022 ·
Supplied court order; no reported citation stated
The review application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Division Bench · Surya Prakash Kesarwani · Jayant Banerji
1. Facts of the case
The applicant sought withdrawal of Civil Misc. Review Application No. 315 of 2022 through counsel.
2. Discussion by the Hon’ble Court
The Court disposed of the review application on the recorded withdrawal request.
3. Judicial decision
The review application was dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Outcome / in whose favour
The review proceeding ended without a determination of the underlying tax merits.
5. AKHB REVIEW POINT
Use the printed order date of 14 July 2022, not the digital-signature date of 1 August 2022. The source describes counsel as appearing for respondent No. 1/applicant; no correction of that description or inference about the underlying order is made.
Source and verification
Complete supplied one-page original read and visually inspected; original PDF bytes verified by SHA-256. Only source-identified provisions and assessment years are recorded. No PAN is stated. Subsequent treatment and current law have not been cleared.
Source SHA-256: c96810193a39cc01fefcdb2e5480ea029e3aef5d2ed1c2eeaebabf987f17e7fe
Only source-identified provisions are recorded. No current monetary threshold, current statutory equivalence or 2025 Act applicability is inferred.
Source checked 2026-10-20. Subsequent proceedings and current precedential treatment have not been comprehensively verified.
AI disclosure and professional disclaimer
This AKHB research note was prepared with AI assistance from an identified primary report. Independent human review is not represented.
General legal and tax research only; not legal or tax advice. Verify the complete judgment, applicable statutory version and subsequent treatment before reliance. The AKHB REVIEW POINT is editorial analysis, not the Court’s holding. No current-law clearance is claimed.