ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT · SOURCE-REVIEWED PROCEDURAL ORDER
Ashoka Chandra v. Income Tax Officer and Two Others
Writ Tax No.400 of 2022 ·
Supplied court order; no reported citation stated
The Court dismissed the writ as infructuous.
Division Bench · Surya Prakash Kesarwani · Jayant Banerji
1. Facts of the case
Ashoka Chandra v. Income Tax Officer and Two Others, Writ Tax No.400 of 2022. Counsel for Ashoka Chandra stated that the writ had become infructuous and sought dismissal on that basis. The supplied one-page order does not identify AY, PAN or the underlying tax amount.
2. Discussion by the Hon’ble Court
The Court disposed of the request recorded in the supplied order. No substantive tax issue or underlying assessment was adjudicated.
3. Judicial decision
The Court dismissed the writ as infructuous.
4. Outcome / in whose favour
The proceeding ended on the stated procedural basis. No tax claim was allowed or disallowed on merits by this short order.
5. AKHB REVIEW POINT
Do not substitute withdrawal or a merits dismissal for the express infructuous disposal; the event causing infructuousness is not supplied. Use the printed order date rather than a later digital-signature timestamp.
Source and verification
Complete supplied one-page original read and visually inspected; original PDF bytes verified by SHA-256. Only source-identified provisions and assessment years are recorded. No PAN is stated. Subsequent treatment and current law have not been cleared.
Source SHA-256: b015e1b96e19eb6a9a60a5ea1288da960322be46fed44a52332d8b894e66e21c
Only source-identified provisions are recorded. No current monetary threshold, current statutory equivalence or 2025 Act applicability is inferred.
Source checked 2026-10-19. Subsequent proceedings and current precedential treatment have not been comprehensively verified.
AI disclosure and professional disclaimer
This AKHB research note was prepared with AI assistance from an identified primary report. Independent human review is not represented.
General legal and tax research only; not legal or tax advice. Verify the complete judgment, applicable statutory version and subsequent treatment before reliance. The AKHB REVIEW POINT is editorial analysis, not the Court’s holding. No current-law clearance is claimed.