ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT · SOURCE-REVIEWED PROCEDURAL ORDER
Ask Education Society Lucknow through President Kirti Kumar v. Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi and others
Writ-C No.9557 of 2021 ·
Supplied court order; no reported citation stated
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Division Bench · Attau Rahman Masoodi · Narendra Kumar Johari
1. Facts of the case
Ask Education Society Lucknow through President Kirti Kumar v. Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi and others, Writ-C No.9557 of 2021. Petitioner's counsel said the writ would not be pressed and requested withdrawal. Revenue counsel had no objection. The supplied one-page order does not identify AY, PAN or the underlying tax amount.
2. Discussion by the Hon’ble Court
The Court disposed of the request recorded in the supplied order. No substantive tax issue or underlying assessment was adjudicated.
3. Judicial decision
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Outcome / in whose favour
The proceeding ended on the stated procedural basis. No tax claim was allowed or disallowed on merits by this short order.
5. AKHB REVIEW POINT
No reason for withdrawal, statutory settlement, fresh-filing liberty or tax-merits conclusion is stated. Use the printed order date rather than a later digital-signature timestamp.
Source and verification
Complete supplied one-page original read and visually inspected; original PDF bytes verified by SHA-256. Only source-identified provisions and assessment years are recorded. No PAN is stated. Subsequent treatment and current law have not been cleared.
Source SHA-256: c52ae3bd6a0a593bef30b08ec24706aa1130ae05a868255efee08aac269e0c1e
Only source-identified provisions are recorded. No current monetary threshold, current statutory equivalence or 2025 Act applicability is inferred.
Source checked 2026-10-19. Subsequent proceedings and current precedential treatment have not been comprehensively verified.
AI disclosure and professional disclaimer
This AKHB research note was prepared with AI assistance from an identified primary report. Independent human review is not represented.
General legal and tax research only; not legal or tax advice. Verify the complete judgment, applicable statutory version and subsequent treatment before reliance. The AKHB REVIEW POINT is editorial analysis, not the Court’s holding. No current-law clearance is claimed.