ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT · SOURCE-REVIEWED PROCEDURAL ORDER
Anju Rastogi v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax and Another
Income Tax Appeal No. 85 of 2019; Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application No. 1 of 2020 ·
Supplied court order; no reported citation stated
Income-tax appeal dismissed as withdrawn; interim order, if any, stood discharged.
Division Bench · Sunita Agarwal · Deepak Verma
1. Facts of the case
Income Tax Appeal No. 85 of 2019 came before the Hon’ble Court on Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application No. 1 of 2020. Counsel holding brief for the appellant was present. No assessment year, PAN, tax amount or underlying tax ground is stated.
2. Discussion by the Hon’ble Court
The Hon’ble Court disposed of the appeal procedurally on withdrawal without determining the underlying tax merits. The source gives no settlement or other substantive reason for withdrawal.
3. Judicial decision
The withdrawal application was allowed and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order, if any, stood discharged.
4. Outcome / in whose favour
The appeal ended by withdrawal. The conditional wording does not establish that an interim order actually existed, and the Court did not validate or invalidate the underlying tax action.
5. AKHB REVIEW POINT
Do not infer a Vivad Se Vishwas option, completed settlement, tax-merits result, restoration or fresh-proceeding liberty from this short disposal. Identify any actual interim order separately before relying on its discharge.
Source and verification
Complete supplied one-page order read and visually inspected. Actual individual Drive original SHA-256 independently verified; full text matched the preserved source review. No assessment year, PAN or substantive tax issue is stated. Subsequent treatment, compliance and current law are not cleared.
Source SHA-256: 4b7bfa78cf34aa84678f5d75aa44fa1d99690beefa71f2497249b67744439922
Only provisions expressly identified in this order are recorded. No substantive tax merits or current statutory equivalence is inferred.
Source checked 2026-10-19. Later proceedings, compliance and current precedential treatment have not been comprehensively verified.
AI disclosure and professional disclaimer
This AKHB research note was prepared with AI assistance from an identified primary report. Independent human review is not represented.
General legal and tax research only; not legal or tax advice. Verify the complete judgment, applicable statutory version and subsequent treatment before reliance. The AKHB REVIEW POINT is editorial analysis, not the Court’s holding. No current-law clearance is claimed.