ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT · SOURCE-REVIEWED PROCEDURAL ORDER

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Agra v. Vikas Lok Sewa Samiti

Income Tax Appeal No. 293 of 2013 ·
Supplied court order; no reported citation stated

Revenue appeal dismissed as infructuous following reported registration; no costs.

Division Bench · Bharati Sapru · Vivek Varma

1. Facts of the case

Assessee counsel stated that registration had been granted by CIT-II, Agra on 24 July 2014. The Department supplied that order, which the Court retained on record; the registration provision and terms are not reproduced.

Source: PDF p.1 (complete supplied order)

2. Discussion by the Hon’ble Court

In light of the reported registration, the Court treated Revenue’s appeal as infructuous. It did not adjudicate the registration criteria or interpret a specified registration provision.

Source: PDF p.1 (complete supplied order)

3. Judicial decision

Revenue’s appeal was dismissed as infructuous, with no costs. The 24 July 2014 order was kept on record.

Source: PDF p.1 (complete supplied order)

4. Outcome / in whose favour

The procedural Revenue appeal ended following reported registration. No merits ratio on charitable registration or current eligibility is established.

Source: PDF p.1 (complete supplied order)

5. AKHB REVIEW POINT

The supplied order does not identify the statutory registration provision or reproduce the registration terms. Obtain the retained administrative order and verify later status before relying on a particular registration basis or entitlement.

Source: PDF p.1 (complete supplied order)

Source and verification

Complete one-page supplied order read and visually inspected. Individual Drive original SHA-256 independently verified; complete text matches the preserved source-review packet. AY and PAN are not stated. Later treatment and current law are not cleared.

Source SHA-256: 9b4fe853917c8143ec0651557ebf89cbb91495ea00cdfc875cfed7299de57b5f

Only provisions expressly identified in this order are recorded. No substantive tax merits or current statutory equivalence is inferred.

Source checked 2026-10-19. Later proceedings, compliance and current precedential treatment have not been comprehensively verified.

AI disclosure and professional disclaimer

This AKHB research note was prepared with AI assistance from an identified primary report. Independent human review is not represented.

General legal and tax research only; not legal or tax advice. Verify the complete judgment, applicable statutory version and subsequent treatment before reliance. The AKHB REVIEW POINT is editorial analysis, not the Court’s holding. No current-law clearance is claimed.