High Court procedural orders
19 source-reviewed orders. Selected coverage; these notes do not represent an exhaustive inventory or current-law clearance.
Tripura Cricket Association v. Commissioner of Income Tax and Others
2017-01-24 · WP(C) No. 393 of 2015
Writ disposed of as not pressed after success before CIT(A); refund of deposited Rs 2,61,44,624 with accrued interest directed upon proper application.
Smt. Kamla Varma and Another v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Shillong Circle, Shillong
2017-03-29 · WP(C) No. 36 of 2017
Directors sought defreezing of company bank accounts and maintenance of three appeals without 15 percent pre-deposit. Petition withdrawn with liberty to file afresh or seek appropriate remedies after Court identified framing defects; merits expressly untouched.
Commissioner of Income Tax, Kanpur v. M/s Bodega Alcobev, Kanpur
2018-01-02 · Income Tax Appeal No. 7 of 2015
Revenue appeal dismissed for tax effect below the monetary limit, as recorded in this order.
Commissioner of Income Tax and Another v. M/s K.G. Hotel Pvt. Ltd.
2018-01-08 · Income Tax Appeal No. 466 of 2008
Revenue appeal dismissed on the monetary-limit ground; no assessment merits decided.
Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and Two Others
2018-01-09 · Writ Tax No. 17 of 2018
Reassessment order produced and supplied; writ dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition.
Rajendra Kumar Gupta v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and Two Others
2018-01-09 · Writ Tax No. 641 of 2017
Writ dismissed for non-prosecution after counsel stated that he had no instructions.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s Setia Carriers
2018-01-09 · Income Tax Appeal No. 92 of 2015
Revenue conceded tax effect below the monetary limit; appeal dismissed as not maintainable.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s Piyush Crefinvest (P) Ltd.
2018-01-11 · Income Tax Appeal No. 563 of 2009
Appeal dismissed as not maintainable on the recorded low-tax-effect ground; no tax merits adjudicated.
M/s Metro & Metro v. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax
2018-01-18 · Income Tax Appeal No. 68 of 2014
Taxpayer appeal dismissed for non-prosecution after counsel reported no instructions.
Commissioner of Income Tax, Meerut v. Jitendra Kumar Gupta
2018-02-22 · Income Tax Appeal No. 267 of 2010
Appeal dismissed as not maintainable on the recorded low-tax-effect ground; no tax merits adjudicated.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Shri Laxmi Narain Khetan, Proprietor, M/s Vrindavan Carpet
2018-02-22 · Income Tax Appeal No. 409 of 2010
Appeal dismissed as not maintainable on the recorded low-tax-effect ground; no tax merits adjudicated.
Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Kanpur v. M/s Super House Leathers Ltd.
2018-02-27 · Income Tax Appeal No. 233 of 2011
Appeal dismissed as not maintainable on the recorded low-tax-effect ground; no tax merits adjudicated.
Commissioner of Income Tax and Another v. M/s Sahkari Ganna Vikas Samiti Ltd.
2018-03-05 · Income Tax Appeal No. 411 of 2010
Appeal dismissed as not maintainable on the recorded low-tax-effect ground; no tax merits adjudicated.
Manav Jain v. Income Tax Officer and Another
2018-03-07 · Writ Tax No. 206 of 2018
Writ dismissed as not pressed after counsel stated that the relief sought had already been granted.
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Kanpur v. Shri Pankaj Jaisawl
2018-03-08 · Income Tax Appeal No. 245 of 2017
Appeal dismissed as not maintainable on the recorded low-tax-effect ground; no tax merits adjudicated.
Meghalaya Electricity Corporation Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Shillong and Others
2018-10-30 · WP(C) No. 391 of 2018
Confronted during argument with non-maintainability, petitioner sought withdrawal with liberty to pursue available remedies. Petition dismissed as withdrawn with that liberty; no tax merits determined.
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Shillong v. M/s S.S. Netcom Private Limited
2024-02-05 · MC(ITA) No. 1 of 2023
821-day delay condoned on sufficient cause; miscellaneous application disposed, Registry to diarize appeal for consideration.
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Shillong v. Dhar Construction Company
2024-03-14 · MC(ITA) No. 1 of 2024
187-day delay application: reasons found unacceptable; Court required Rs 10,000 costs to Shillong Bar Association within two weeks of receipt of order and receipt production before Registry diarization if otherwise in order.
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Shillong v. Dhar Construction Company
2024-11-14 · ITA No. 3 of 2024
Revenue counsel stated on instructions that tax effect fell below the ceiling and the client proposed not to proceed. Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.